Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Hamza Andreas Tzortzis is an international public speaker and a writer. Hamza presents "Face the Faith" on Islam Channel and is a senior researcher and lecturer for iERA. He has debated prominent intellectuals and academics. Some of his interlocutors include the leading humanist Peter Cave, the editor of the Philosophy Now mazagine Rick Lewis and the highly acclaimed Professor Simon Blackburn. More recently Hamza debated one of the leading American atheists and secular activists Dr. Ed Buckner.
"Dawkins’ also rejects a supernatural designer because he thinks, as an explanation, it lack explanatory power; in other words, no advance is made. He raises this objection because he feels that a supernatural designer is just as complex as design. However Dawkins’ objection is problematic as he assumes that a supernatural designer is as complex as the universe. But a supernatural designer, in other words God, is one of the simplest concepts understood by all. This opinion is expressed by many Philosophers including the famous atheist turned theist Professor Anthony Flew." Click here to read more.
3 comments:
I expected more arguments from Dr.sohil. Not that i think he will have anything strong against us but he didnt even put a proper excuse to be leave islam.
I find it cheap how people put difference of opinion as a bad thing when in fact it is what makes us human.
Jazaak allah khair Hamza, keep up thr good work.
Brother Hamza,
Thankyou for coming to Canada. You were amazing at Mcmaster :)
Assalamu alaikum wa rahmatullahi wa baraktuhu,
I would like to comment on two points brother Hamza,
1) Dr. Khalid's arguments are classical ones and don't need any commenting, but I what I couldn't help commenting on is the attitude of "converts" to secular humanism, how they speak nonsense and try to fool people specifically with regards to two things Dr. Khalid mentioned
a)Of how sex is somthing very nice and beautiful and regurgirating cliches of how religion suppresses those beautiful emotions, and how they most ignorantly and deceptively keep repeating the lie of how "sex equals love" while they know deep inside that if sex is not regulated it becomes a destructive force. This truth, no sincere individual can deny. I would have liked to hear his opinion on what he thinks of porn and its effect on humanity this moderate friendly secularist, and how "practical" is secularism in dealing with it.
b) How he is actually criticizing the inner conscience that we call in Islam "Al nafs al lawwama" and how people should not feel guilt or accounatability for their actions. Now what is the basis of morality even in a secular society?, what makes people feel bad for doing something evil to others?, or make them feel good on the inside when they do some good deed although no one can see them,is it not this inner self.
2) My second comment goes to my dear brother hamza, although the ahmadi guy was very rude and I do think that ahmadiyya are misguided, if the situation was as he described that u said to him in his face the story of how mirza ghulam ahmed died, regardless of its truth, as an argument against ahmadiyya then I think that you were mistaken in that, and out of my love for u my brother I feel that it does not befit you, what befits the mumin is not to resort to embarrasing or offending his opponent. If the situation wasn't as he described and u have a justification then I apologize and may ALLAh(swt) forgive my ignorance.
Wassalamu alaikum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuhu
Post a Comment