Press Release: iERA Responds to the “British Schools, Islamic Rules” Panorama Programme
On the 22nd November 2010 the BBC aired a Panorama programme entitled “British Schools, Islamic Rules”. This programme aimed to investigate the “disturbing evidence” that some Muslim schools were providing a platform to “extremist preachers” and “fundamentalist Islamic groups”. The programme also attempted to “expose” the extreme, anti-Semitic and homophobic material found within the curriculum of some Islamic schools.
In short, the programme misrepresented established Islamic teachings on a range of issues in a manner that portrayed them as crude and insensitive whilst linking them to social unrest and violence.
In a statement by Saqib Sattar, Vice-Chairman of the Islamic Education and Research Academy (iERA), he said “The attack on Muslim schools as an institution is both ill-informed and misguided. Muslim schools constantly achieve high academic standards with students continuously becoming highly responsible members of society, contributing positively to the public good. No ‘hard’ evidence has ever been presented otherwise. Muslim Schools have excelled in this regard, due in no small part to their ethos which is rooted in the Islamic scholarly tradition which provides an objective and cohesive basis for social values and norms, something which we find lacking in our increasingly secular society. The irony is that most of our social ills stem from the failure of state schools and society at large to provide such grounding, leading ever more conscientious parents to choose private or faith schools for their children’s secondary education. Faith schools and communities are providing that important moral voice for our society, making their presence felt through social welfare projects across the country. The contribution of faith communities should actually be championed and not maligned.”
The BBC has shown that it does not have the ability to convey the reality of the Islamic tradition. iERA condemns such irresponsible and sensationalist programmes. It is obvious that this Panorama programme has been designed to attract viewers without engaging their minds.
Hamza Andreas Tzortzis, iERA’s media representative said, “The attack on mainstream Islamic speakers because they hold established theological views is making the job of community cohesion difficult, as is the constant misconstruing or lack of context with regards to their statements. The programme-makers would have been better served to look deeply into the Islamic scholarly tradition and its historical impact, and they would have found a beautiful model of community cohesion. For example it is a well known historical fact that Islam and Muslims for centuries have been offering protection to the Jewish community. A contemporary Jewish Historian Zion Zohar for instance has written that Jews used to see Muslims as liberators from Christian persecution. There is a whole corpus of historical and theological material that strongly indicates conclusions that contrast with the content of the Panorama programme. Another example includes the Jewish Historian Amnon Cohen who writes that Jewish people, particularly women, used to go to Islamic authorities for adjudication of disputes even though they were always given the option to go to Rabbinical courts.
The reality that Islam has ensured security and peace for the Jewish people is not a historical accident, it is engrained in the Islamic traditional sources. For instance the Prophet Muhammad (peace & blessing be upon Him) said that ‘whoever harms a non-Muslim [under Muslim protection] harms me’. Additionally the Qur’an, the holy book of the Muslims, states in its 60th chapter ‘And He does not forbid you to deal kindly and justly with anyone who has not fought you for your faith or driven you out of your homes: God loves the just”. The difference between political confrontation and communal engagement has always been clear in the Islamic tradition. It is very surprising that the BBC ignored this fact, and shows once again that it has prioritised sensationalism over substance.
For many Muslims, Islamic law is an important part of their lives. Islamic law covers politics, economics, criminal law, business, contracts, family life, hygiene, social issues and many more. There are similarities with Western secular law in terms of the rights it gives and the principles and values that it upholds. To reduce Islamic law to criminal punishments is a caricature of a comprehensive legal and social framework.”
Sattar further adds “The decontextualised references to cutting the hand of the thief and other criminal punishments in the programme are the equivalent of claiming that British law is unjust because it has short sentences for rapists without even taking into consideration the social and jurisprudential context of the British legal system. For example, Professor of Law at Harvard University Noah Feldman has tried to educate the west on Islamic punishments. He states “Today, when we invoke the harsh punishments prescribed by Shariah [Islamic law] for a handful of offences, we rarely acknowledge the high standards of proof necessary for their implementation.”
To warmly articulate the Islamic worldview and demystify the negative image this programme attempted to paint of Islam and Muslims, iERA will be distributing their new CD “Another View” and a leaflet clarifying the BBC’s misconceptions across the UK, and also on the morning of Monday 29th November 2010 outside the BBC Headquarters with specific educational packs for the programme makers.
END
Notes to the Editors:
1. iERA stands for the Islamic Education and Research Academy
2. iERA is committed to presenting Islam to the wider society, http://www.iera.org.uk/.
3. iERA will distribute the CD’s and the leaflets at stalls and various outlets in the UK.
4. The distribution at the BBC will happen on Monday 29th November from 7:30am until 10:00am.
5. To contact our media team please email media@iera.org.uk.
6. iERA is a registered UK charity in the United Kingdom, number 1134566.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

7 comments:
MashaAllah keep up the good da'wah
How can I participate/contribute to iERA activities being so far here in India? It is so shameful to just watch all this things going on and just keep reading them.
This is typical of Panorama- using the same old tactics to tarnish Islam and continue to create scaremongering- now they want British viewers to think that Islamic schools are undertaking these extremist lessons so one day they can unleash it upon the West!!
Its good to see IERA take a stance- hopefully many more will be able to read such statements with an open mind.
On a similar note,
http://www.zaufishan.co.uk/2010/11/dear-bbc-dont-blame-muslim-schools-for.html
Power to Muslim education.
www.muslimness.com
It seems the BBC run an annual "shock, horror and awe" programme looking at the teachings of Islam and how Muslims go about their business in the UK. They seem to focus on Islam's penal code and stance on destructive relationships (namely same gender relationships) Islam classes as wrong, but the BBC seem to fail to highlight that ALL other religions, that as far as I know, condemn such relationships! Other religions are bullied into accepting things from outsiders and secularists. Look at SOME so-called Christians who have gone against their teachings and have accepted g*ys and lesbi*ans into their realm, also to a milder extent, women bishops and ministers are becoming the norm when it is against their own teachings! This, in the name of freedom i.e. secularism.
Yes, I agree certain things can be be wrong or interpreted wrongly and things be taken out of context and taken to extremes, but that is the job of the scholars of that religion to debate, decide or disagree on, and not for anybody else, whether it be for Christianity, Islam or Judaism or others! There will be certain things in one religion/ideology that is not palatable to other religions or ideologies, but that is a fact of life, and one must deal with it intellectually.
The UK follows democracy and has abolished the capital punishment only probably 50 years ago (at a guess) yet the USA follows democracy but still continues with capital punishments in some states. Why don't BBC run a shock, horror and awe series on the USA?
Freedom as they fly it is utter hypocrisy! If it is freedom and these 'values' YOU believe in, then what makes YOU right and a know-it-all and others are wrong when they choose to do certain things, belief in certain things and act in a certain way? It is their freedom to do so. Isn't it absurd to then tell them they are wrong when in fact it is your own belief in so-called freedom that espouses absolute freedom to what they like or to believe in and only condition if majority agree to it, a la democracy!
Judging other people's moral code or penal code system is a fallacy because they are subjective and relative to each people, nation or group depending on what system/ideology/religion they follow. Hence, there is no absolute right or wrong when it comes to penal codes and punishments as these are based on opinion and are not classed as facts or truths. Absolute right and wrong only occurs if everybody believes or adheres to the same rules, morals and ethics. The only way that can occur is if everybody in the world accepts the same system, ideology or religion!
...and that is what Islaam calls to - truth!
Don't blame Muslim schools for Britain's social problems says Ed West.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/edwest/100064992/dont-blame-muslim-schools-for-britains-social-problems/
.."It is also unfair to blame Islamic schools for segregation, as the programme seemed to imply. After the 2001 race riots a Government inquiry concluded that educational apartheid was responsible for wider racial segregation in the north of England, the result of which was a £250m (yes, £250m!) project to close Burnley’s segregated secondary schools and replace them with forcibly spanking new, desegregated ones."
Ed West is a journalist and social commentator who specialises in politics, religion and low culture. He is @edwestonline on Twitter.
The westerners say that Islamic law is "barbaric".They also claim that cutting the hand of a thief is also "barbaric",but if really ponder over it on which punishment is more barbaric i would say prison is much more barbaric because it takes your freedom away which in my opinion is much more valuable than a hand.In prison you would not get to be with your family and friends(although they do let them visit you but this is only at certain times),you would not get to visit places that you have always wanted to go,you would not get to fulfill your dreams and ambitions while you are in jail,you are just trapped in a small room with not much to do and it is in this condition you are susceptible to getting yourself involve in more crimes in jail(such as drugs or gang fights)and by the time you get out of jail you already have become a bigger criminal than when you first entered...If i was in a situation where i had to choose between a 10 year jail sentence or getting my hands chopped off i would choose my hands getting chopped off(hesitatingly).So I hope anyone reading this would never say "cutting of the hands is barbaric"because prison is way more barbaric.
Post a Comment