Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Hamza Andreas Tzortzis is an international public speaker and a writer. Hamza presents "Face the Faith" on Islam Channel and is a senior researcher and lecturer for iERA. He has debated prominent intellectuals and academics. Some of his interlocutors include the leading humanist Peter Cave, the editor of the Philosophy Now mazagine Rick Lewis and the highly acclaimed Professor Simon Blackburn. More recently Hamza debated one of the leading American atheists and secular activists Dr. Ed Buckner.
"Dawkins’ also rejects a supernatural designer because he thinks, as an explanation, it lack explanatory power; in other words, no advance is made. He raises this objection because he feels that a supernatural designer is just as complex as design. However Dawkins’ objection is problematic as he assumes that a supernatural designer is as complex as the universe. But a supernatural designer, in other words God, is one of the simplest concepts understood by all. This opinion is expressed by many Philosophers including the famous atheist turned theist Professor Anthony Flew." Click here to read more.
3 comments:
Assalamun Alaikum, Brother Hamza.
As Muslims we are tremendously proud of your contribution for the sake of Islam, Masha Allah.
I am a revert to Islam like yourself and share a similar ethnic background to you. I am an Italian of Sicilian origin.
Brother Hamza would it not be great for Muslims and non-Muslims if a 2/3 day debate on the following topics with these for eg potential representatives:
Yourself, Adnan Oktar or rep, Dr Jamal Badawi and Dr Zakir Naik for the Muslims
versus
Richard Dawkins, Hitchens, Sam Harris or whoever they like
The topics would be
(1) God's Existence
(2) Evolution, fact or fiction?
(3) Is the Qu'ran God's word?
You would present the inimitability of the Qu'ran and the finite/infinite arguments.
Adnan Oktar/rep would show that evolution, unsupported by any evidence is a fraud maintained and kept alive institutionally and undemocratically by a darwinist dictatorship in the name of blind attachment to materialist ideology.
Also the challenge of producing just ONE single, genuine transitional fossil could be raised.
Dr Jamal Badawi could do a presentation on the immense historical contributions (eg the experimental method)of Muslims to science and the West.
Finally Dr Zakir Naik could conclude proceedings with a presentation on the scientific miracles of the Glorious Qu'ran.
Of course, the above speakers does not neccessarily have to be in that order.
I know for sure that you and any of the above or any other Muslim for that matter would be immediately ready to get it on, Oxford, Cambridge and preferably on mainstream tv, whatever - but sadly it is extremely unlikely that any of the atheists above would agree to such debates. Even if they themselves would want to, the secular establishment behind them would discourage it and not allow it.
I believe it would be a tremedous occasion to conclusively refute and expose, in front of millions, the philosophical and scientific absurdity that is the materialist premise and ideology.
In other words, we would indeed see, Mr 'hide behind secular establishment' Dawkins who the DELUDED ONE/s is and are.
Wasalaam
Yusuf Salahuhdin Morreale
Assalamun Alaikum, Brother Hamza.
As Muslims we are tremendously proud of your contribution for the sake of Islam, Masha Allah.
I am a revert to Islam like yourself and share a similar ethnic background to you. I am an Italian of Sicilian origin.
Brother Hamza would it not be great for Muslims and non-Muslims if a 2/3 day debate on the following topics with these for eg potential representatives:
Yourself, Adnan Oktar or rep, Dr Jamal Badawi and Dr Zakir Naik for the Muslims
versus
Richard Dawkins, Hitchens, Sam Harris or whoever they like
The topics would be
(1) God's Existence
(2) Evolution, fact or fiction?
(3) Is the Qu'ran God's word?
You would present the inimitability of the Qu'ran and the finite/infinite arguments.
Adnan Oktar/rep would show that evolution, unsupported by any evidence is a fraud maintained and kept alive institutionally and undemocratically by a darwinist dictatorship in the name of blind attachment to materialist ideology.
Also the challenge of producing just ONE single, genuine transitional fossil could be raised.
Dr Jamal Badawi could do a presentation on the immense historical contributions (eg the experimental method)of Muslims to science and the West.
Finally Dr Zakir Naik could conclude proceedings with a presentation on the scientific miracles of the Glorious Qu'ran.
Of course, the above speakers does not neccessarily have to be in that order.
I know for sure that you and any of the above or any other Muslim for that matter would be immediately ready to get it on, Oxford, Cambridge and preferably on mainstream tv, whatever - but sadly it is extremely unlikely that any of the atheists above would agree to such debates. Even if they themselves would want to, the secular establishment behind them would discourage it and not allow it.
I believe it would be a tremedous occasion to conclusively refute and expose, in front of millions, the philosophical and scientific absurdity that is the materialist premise and ideology.
In other words, we would indeed see, Mr 'hide behind secular establishment' Dawkins who the DELUDED ONE/s is and are.
Wasalaam
Yusuf Salahuhdin Morreale
Salaam,
Once again Br. Hamza performed superbly in the debate. And once again the opposing speaker did not come up with any valid rebuttals.
Whilst this is a good outcome for the sake of Islam, I believe that Br. Hamza should debate with people that are slightly more informed about philosophy and Islamic doctrine just so that a more pertinent discussion can take place.
In addition, it would be great to see Hamza deal with a new topic for example evolution or shari'ah law. I personally would like to see a detailed presentation on what modern Shari'ah law would look like according to Hamza.
Wasalaam,
AY
Post a Comment