Comment: Sarkozy’s Values & the Honour of Women


On the 22nd June 2009 French President Sarkozy announced that the Burqa is incongruous with French values. He said "In our country, we cannot accept that women be prisoners behind a screen, cut off from all social life, deprived of all identity," Sarkozy continued "The burqa is not a religious sign, it's a sign of subservience."[1]

Despite Sarkozy’s political opportunism, his ideological contradictions expose his conscious ignorance, and some may say, out right hatred for the Islamic way of life. Sarkozy who advocates and propagates liberal secularism has forgotten his intellectual heritage. Liberal secularism rests upon the premise of individualism, in other words, viewing the self – the human being – as an abstract entity divorced from social attachments. Two key values are built from this premise, individual freedom and individual rights. According to individual freedom, also explained as freedom of choice, the Burqa shouldn’t be a problem and should be tolerated under French liberal values. So why the contradiction?

Sarkozy is a liberal secular ideologue who doesn’t want to understand or discuss the Islamic way of life. The Islamic way of life is not based upon the false premise of individualism, rather it views the human being as an entity with social links and obligations. This correct view on mankind develops and builds sublime values, which include honouring and protecting women.

In the Sarkozy paradigm these values do not exist hence he wants to fight against their emergence, even if it means contradicting his own ideological beliefs. For example in a liberal secular context, individual freedom allows and, in the case of Sarkozy (his wife is an ex-nudist model), promotes pornography. However pornography has been shown to facilitate rape. According to academic research by Diana E. Russell in her publication ‘Pornography & Rape: A causal model’ she states,

“ My theory about how pornography – violent and non-violent – can cause rape…drawn on the findings of recent research….I believe there are many factors that play a causal role in this crime. I have not attempted here to evaluate the relative importance of these different causal factors, but merely to show the overwhelming evidence that pornography is a major one of them”[2]

In this study journals and academic research were cited which concluded that 56% of rapists implicated pornography in the commission of their offences, 66% of rapists claimed they were incited by pornography and 30 % of college students would rape if they could get away with it.[3]

Sarkozy’s world view would not ban or criminalise pornography. This is because society itself is not considered or taken into account due to the core value of ‘individual freedom’. As a result Sarkozy’s values have contributed to the increase in sexual crimes in France. There are more than 25,000 rapes a year in France alone, and before Sarkozy points the finger at the Muslims or immigrants, 91% of those convicted are of French nationality.[4]

France is not alone in failing to protect and honour women either, in the UK 167 women are raped everyday[5] and in the US a woman is raped every 6 minutes and battered every 15 seconds. [6]

However in Islam, pornography is banned and is viewed as a dishonor to women. Islam protects women by honoring and providing mechanisms in its social model to protect them. The noble Qur'an highlights the immense responsibility men have towards women. The Qur'an says "Men are qawwamoona over women"[7]. The key word here is qawwamoona which comes from words such as qiwaamun meaning means of support, qaama almarata meaning he undertook the support of the woman, qaama alaiha meaning he looked after her, and qaama bihi he supported it. Therefore the Qur'an tells society to look after, protect and honour women.

But Sarkozy would rather flaunt that his wife was an ex-nudist model.

References

[1] http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/8112821.stm
[2] Diana Russell. Pornography and Rape: A Causal Model, in Feminism and Pornography. Oxford Readings in Feminism. 2000.
[3] Ibid.
[4] http://www.sosfemmes.com/english_rape/rape_statistics.htm
[5] http://www.amnesty.org.uk/content.asp?CategoryID=10309
[6] Broken Bodies, Shattered Minds: Torture and Ill Treatment of Women, Amnesty International, 2001
[7] Qur'an 4:34

8 comments:

Le-Ann Mariamlelue said...

The way that you analysed this topic was exceptional.
Thank you for posting.
His contradictory idealism is only further opportunity for greater oppression.
may God be with all of us ameen
Regards,
Le-Ann

Zaufishan said...

Peace be with you, I agree with Le-Ann; an exceptional analysis and kudos from myself for having the courage to speak out against it as well as exposing another facet of The Liberalist's double standards.
Shukran - thank you.

Hamza Andreas Tzortzis said...

JazakAllahkhair. All good is from Islam. Thank you both for your comments.

Anonymous said...

A very intersting read, particularly the research in correlating rape and pornography.

Thank you.

Kamran

Anonymous said...

Asalaamu alaykum wa Rahmat-Allaahi wabarakaatuhu

JazakAllaah Khayran.

It is good to see Muslims raising these issues when so many others choose to ignore or live in comfort zones.

As a Dr, I have worked with sex offenders in the past and agree with what Brother Hamza is saying in this article.

It is a shame that people cannot see Islam for its principles and beliefs, rather people would be more willing to blindly follow the reguritated vomit of racist ideologies and generalise the actions/views of a few who have been highlighted by the media..

The current attack on the Niqaab is now perpertrated by the UKIP..I say current. but what I mean is the attack that has surfaced to the media fronts... What I find most patronising (as someone who wears niqaab) is that non-Muslim men are speaking on behalf of Muslim women and feeling "oppressed" on our behalf, when they have never been oppressed in their lives and have never discussed these issues with Muslim women in the first place. Sorry, but this has really reached another level of patronisation.

Anyone with half a brain Muslim or non-Muslim ought to challenge such views against relgious dress codes. In sha Allaah.

Would a Priest accept advice about his "threatening"/"oppressive" religious dress from a Hindu?

Thanks again for raising this issue, keep up the good work.

H.

Umm Uthmaan said...

Jazakullah khairan for such a well-written article. If Sarkozy had the courage of his convictions, he'd be celebrating diversity!

iqra said...

a really interesting read
i was researching more abt this and i came across this
http://www.impactlab.com/2008/01/06/internet-porn-shown-to-decrease-incidence-of-rape/

i was wondering what you thought?

malaysia said...

keep up the good work brother !